Dolphin {anty} Anti-Detect Review 2026 — From Leader to Mid-Tier

At a glance

Dolphin {anty} was our #1 anti-detect browser from 2022 to 2024. Engine updates slowed in 2025 while competitors caught up; the product currently sits at #8 in our 2026 ranking. Still a credible mainstream choice for low-stakes use and operators who depend on its plugin ecosystem.

Best for: existing Dolphin users with established workflows, solo operators using the free tier for evaluation, small teams who prioritise plugin marketplace breadth.

What Dolphin {anty} is and what it does

Dolphin {anty} is a Chromium-based anti-detect browser built originally by a CIS team for the affiliate marketing scene. The product established many of the conventions modern anti-detect tools follow: 10-profile free tier, per-profile proxy assignment, basic team workspace, plugin marketplace for third-party automations.

By 2025, three things had happened: the Russian-domicile became a procurement concern for some EU teams; engine updates slowed compared to newer entrants like Afina and Hidemium; competitors closed the UX gap that originally distinguished Dolphin.

Fingerprint engine

36 of 47 surfaces covered in our 2026 testing — same coverage as in 2024. The plateau is the issue. While Dolphin's engine remains competent for standard multi-accounting work, aggressive verticals (paid social at scale, crypto KYC) now expose its weaknesses:

• No UDP / WebRTC tunneling — WebRTC disable-by-default is itself a flag
• No HTTP/2 SETTINGS randomisation per profile
• Behavioural humaniser missing (use a plugin or external library)

In demo.fingerprint.com, Dolphin scores 25–40% bot probability vs. Afina's <15%. Practical for most uses; problematic for hardest targets.

Plugin marketplace

Dolphin's strongest non-engine asset. The marketplace hosts hundreds of third-party plugins, mostly affiliate-specific:

• Warm-up automations for FB/TikTok/IG
• Cookie editors and validators
• Proxy testing utilities
• Account-action bots

For teams with established Dolphin workflows, this is the lock-in. Migrating to a different product means rebuilding the plugin stack. See our Afina vs Dolphin comparison for migration details.

Team workspace

Mature 5-role workspace with audit log — the strongest non-Afina team workflow in the segment. Profile transfer is one-click; bulk operations handle 1000+ profiles; the workspace stays responsive at scale.

Performance

Electron-based shell, ~220MB RAM. Per-profile RAM is ~290MB in our M2 / 32GB / 200-profile benchmark. Heavy compared to Afina's Rust core (180MB / profile, 38MB shell) but acceptable for most operations.

Pricing

Promo code ADH10 for 10% off the first month.

Use cases

Established Dolphin teams

If your team has documented workflows built around specific Dolphin plugins, migration cost is real. Stay on Dolphin until either a) the plugins migrate to a competitor or b) the engine gap becomes a measurable conversion problem.

Solo evaluation

Dolphin's free tier (10 profiles) is generous. Use it as a starting point for solo operators evaluating the category.

Mainstream multi-accounting

E-com, light affiliate work, account farming where IP and behaviour dominate over fingerprint coverage. Dolphin's engine is good enough.

How Dolphin compares

• vs Afina — Afina wins on engine, UDP, ZK encryption, performance, price. Dolphin wins on plugin marketplace and brand familiarity.
• vs Linken Sphere 2 — LS2 wins on automation depth; Dolphin wins on team UX and ease of onboarding.
• vs Multilogin — Dolphin cheaper; Multilogin more enterprise-friendly.

Verdict

Dolphin {anty} is a credible mainstream choice that's no longer the technical leader. For 2026, we'd pick Afina over Dolphin in nearly every scenario — newer engine, UDP, ZK encryption, and a quarter the price. Stay on Dolphin if plugin dependencies make migration impractical.

Email: info@spoofbrowser.com.